eLearning Buyer Guides
Use this page to quickly see whether Simple Movement is a fit for your organization — and how we compare to common alternatives like off‑the‑shelf training, internal development, freelancers, and large agencies.
What is the best alternative to hiring an internal eLearning team?
Simple Movement gives organizations access to trained Instructional Designers, Developers, Graphic Designers and Project Managers without requiring them to hire a permanent internal team. Projects can be scaled to available budgets and organizational priorities.
Simple Movement vs. off-the-shelf training
Off-the-shelf training teaches someone else’s version of the subject. Simple Movement builds training around your organization, your people and the outcomes you need.
| Consideration | Off-the-shelf courses | Custom courses from Simple Movement |
|---|---|---|
| Organization-specific content | Limited or none | Built around the organization’s actual processes, policies, products and learners |
| Branding | Generic | Customized |
| Learning objectives | Predetermined by vendor | Designed around client KPIs and outcomes |
| Examples and scenarios | Generic | Based on real organizational situations |
| Accessibility | Depends on vendor | Designed into the project |
| Updates | Controlled by vendor | Client can own and update source files |
| Integration with LMS | Usually standard package | Can be developed directly in or for the client’s LMS |
| Learner relevance | Often limited | High |
| Ownership | Often licensed | Client can own the finished learning assets and editable files |
| Budget | Fixed product/license structure | Scope can be prioritized against available budget |
| Best for | Generic compliance or broad topics | Learning where organizational context and performance matter |
Simple Movement vs. asking existing staff to build courses
An internal Subject Matter Expert should usually contribute the expertise, but building an effective online course requires different skills. Professional eLearning development combines instructional design, learning theory, accessibility, visual design, technology and project management. Simple Movement allows internal experts to contribute their knowledge without requiring them to become eLearning developers.
| Existing staff member building the course | Simple Movement |
|---|---|
| Course development is added to an employee’s existing responsibilities | Dedicated professionals are assigned to the project |
| Employee may understand the subject but not instructional design | Instructional Designers specialize in turning expertise into learning |
| Often no formal ADDIE or learning-design methodology | Structured instructional-design methodology |
| Learning objectives may be unclear | Outcomes are defined before development begins |
| Accessibility is often addressed late or not at all | Accessibility is incorporated throughout design and development |
| Course may become a PowerPoint, PDF or information dump | Content is redesigned as an interactive learning experience |
| Development competes with the employee’s primary job | Client employees remain focused on their core responsibilities |
| Project timelines easily slip | Project is professionally managed |
| Design and graphics may be inconsistent | Professional visual and graphic design |
| Technical LMS knowledge may be limited | LMS and authoring expertise are included |
| Institutional knowledge may remain undocumented | Knowledge becomes a reusable organizational learning asset |
| Hidden cost is employee time and delayed priorities | Scope, timeline and deliverables are clearly managed |
Common delivery options (Simple Movement vs alternatives)
| Option | Typical advantage | Common limitation | Quality of learning | Accessibility | Customization | Internal staff burden | Budget flexibility | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Movement | Experienced instructional design, development, graphic design and project management team | Requires collaboration with client SMEs | High; designed around learners, outcomes and organizational KPIs | Built into design and development | Fully customized | Low | High; scope can be designed around available budget | Organizations that need professional learning built without hiring internally |
| Off-the-shelf courses | Fast to purchase and deploy | Generic, often poorly aligned to organizational context, brand or learner needs | Variable; often passive and generic | Variable | Very limited | Low | Moderate | Generic topics where organization-specific context is unimportant |
| Assign an existing employee | Appears inexpensive | Employee may lack instructional design, ADDIE, accessibility, authoring and learning-development expertise | Highly variable | Often overlooked | High in theory, but limited by expertise | Very high | Appears low-cost but consumes internal capacity | Very small or informal learning tasks |
| Option | Typical advantage | Common limitation | Quality of learning | Accessibility | Customization | Internal staff burden | Budget flexibility | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hire internally | Builds permanent capacity | Recruitment, salary, benefits and ongoing overhead; one hire rarely covers every discipline | Potentially high | Depends on expertise hired | High | Moderate | Low for short-term needs | Organizations with sustained year-round development demand |
| Freelancer | Flexible specialist capacity | Often only one discipline; client may need to manage design, development, graphics and QA separately | Depends heavily on individual | Variable | High | Moderate to high | Moderate | Small, clearly defined projects |
| Large eLearning agency | Broad capability and scale | Higher overhead, larger teams and often less budget flexibility | High | Usually strong | High | Low | Often lower | Large enterprises with substantial budgets |
| Offshore production team | Lower hourly production costs | Time zones, context, communication and educational-design quality can vary | Variable | Variable | Moderate to high | Moderate | High | Production-heavy work with tightly defined specifications |
ICP comparison (who we often work with)
| ICP | Primary problem | Typical trigger | Buyer | Simple Movement outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Education | Faculty/internal teams lack conversion capacity | Courses must move online or be modernized | Director of Teaching & Learning; Procurement Lead | High-quality online courses without permanent staffing |
| Manufacturing | Training priorities exceed internal L&D capacity | Safety, onboarding, compliance, certification, new process/product | VP/Director Training & Development | Consistent, scalable workforce learning |
| Finance & Insurance | Experts know requirements but lack development capacity | Compliance, onboarding, certification, regulatory/product change | VP/Director Training & Development | Accurate, polished, trackable digital training |
| Nonprofit | Funding exists but development capacity does not | Grant or targeted project funding | Executive Director; Program Lead | Funded commitments delivered as reusable learning assets |
Higher education: ways to move courses online
| Approach | Speed | Faculty burden | Instructional quality | Consistency across courses | Accessibility | Scalability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upload classroom materials to LMS | High | Low | Low | Low | Variable | High technically, weak pedagogically |
| Purchase generic courses | High | Low | Moderate | High | Variable | High |
| Simple Movement | High | Low–Moderate | High | High | High | High |
Higher education: course-conversion responsibilities
| Responsibility | Faculty / institution | Simple Movement |
| Subject expertise | ✓ | Supports |
| Existing course content | ✓ | Reviews and restructures |
| Learning objectives | Collaborates | Leads instructional design |
| Course architecture | Reviews | Leads |
| Storyboarding | Reviews | Leads |
| Online-learning pedagogy | Collaborates | Leads |
| Responsibility | Faculty / institution | Simple Movement |
| Interactive activities | Reviews | Designs and develops |
| Assessments | Collaborates | Designs/refines |
| Accessibility | Provides institutional requirements | Implements |
| Graphic design | Approves | Creates |
| Course development | Reviews | Builds |
| LMS implementation | Provides access/guidance | Builds/configures |
| Quality assurance | Final institutional review | Leads QA |
| Project management | Provides stakeholders | Leads |
Corporate training: when Simple Movement becomes relevant
| Organizational trigger | Internal challenge | What Simple Movement can build |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance requirement | Training must be delivered and tracked but the team has no capacity | Compliance courses, assessments, completion tracking |
| New employee onboarding | Managers repeatedly provide the same training | Structured onboarding pathways and modules |
| Health & safety requirement | Training needs consistency across locations and shifts | Interactive health and safety learning |
| New product launch | Sales/service teams need rapid product knowledge | Product education and certification |
| New process or technology | Staff need consistent instruction | Systems and process training |
| Certification requirement | Skills or knowledge must be formally demonstrated | Learning pathways, quizzes and assessments |
| Regulatory change | Existing training is outdated | Rapid course updates or new modules |
| Growth | Internal training resources cannot keep up | Scalable digital training |
Corporate training: staff augmentation vs. project delivery
| Need | Recommended Simple Movement model |
|---|---|
| Need one Instructional Designer temporarily | Staff augmentation |
| Internal team needs extra development capacity | Staff augmentation |
| Need Storyline/Rise/H5P production support | Staff augmentation |
| Need graphic design support | Staff augmentation |
| Need 10 courses developed | Full-project delivery |
| Need compliance training built | Full-project delivery |
| Need onboarding program created | Full-project delivery |
| Need LMS configured and courses loaded | Full-project delivery |
| Need both internal and external resources coordinated | Managed project delivery |
| Need a complete training function temporarily | Integrated Simple Movement team |
Simple Movement can provide individual eLearning professionals or act as an organization’s complete outsourced learning-development team.
Nonprofits: using project funding effectively
| Typical grant-funded need | Common challenge | Simple Movement role |
|---|---|---|
| Create public education resources | Organization has expertise but no learning-development staff | Convert expertise into accessible online learning |
| Train staff or volunteers | Internal team lacks development capacity | Build reusable training |
| Develop certification | Need structured learning and assessment | Design curriculum, assessments and LMS delivery |
| Bilingual learning | English/French delivery required | Bilingual development/localization |
| Accessible resources | Accessibility is a funding or public-sector expectation | Accessible-by-design development |
| Grant proposal | Team needs credible scope, methodology and budget | Co-author development plan and proposal content |
| Project closeout | Need sustainable deliverables after funding ends | Provide reusable courses and editable source files |
Simple Movement and grant-funded projects
| Traditional vendor relationship | Simple Movement approach |
|---|---|
| Vendor engaged after funding is secured | Can support planning before submission |
| Client must define technical learning-development requirements | Simple Movement helps define scope, methodology and deliverables |
| Proposal language may not reflect realistic development processes | Team understands government and funding terminology |
| Development begins after award | Proposal can establish a practical development roadmap |
| Vendor delivers project asset | Simple Movement can also transfer editable source files |
| Knowledge may remain vendor-dependent | Client retains organizational capacity and reusable assets |
Simple Movement can help nonprofits before, during and after a funded project.
Budget comparison
| Traditional approach | Budget model |
|---|---|
| Off-the-shelf provider | Buyer adapts needs to vendor’s available products |
| Large agency | Buyer adapts project to agency pricing |
| Internal hire | Organization commits to ongoing salary and overhead |
| Freelancer | Cost tied largely to individual hourly availability |
| Simple Movement | Project priorities are aligned to the client’s available budget and highest-value KPIs |
Can Simple Movement work with a limited budget?
Yes. Simple Movement works with organizations across a wide range of project and organizational budgets.
Rather than compromising core project outcomes, our team helps clients prioritize the work that will have the greatest impact against the organization’s available resources and KPIs.
Projects are clearly scoped and professionally managed to remain on time and on budget.
Development technology comparison
| Requirement | Simple Movement capability |
|---|---|
| Rapid modular eLearning | Articulate Rise |
| Advanced interactive courses | Articulate Storyline |
| Interactive web learning | H5P |
| Existing Adobe environments | Adobe Captivate |
| LMS-native course development | Yes |
| SCORM-based development | Yes |
| Responsive eLearning | Yes |
| Custom interactions | Yes |
| Quizzes and assessments | Yes |
| Multimedia | Yes |
| Course templates | Yes |
| Accessible development | Yes |
LMS compatibility
| LMS / platform | Simple Movement capability |
|---|---|
| Brightspace / D2L | Course development, customization and integration |
| Canvas | Course development, customization and integration |
| Moodle | Course development, customization and integration |
| Blackboard | Course development, customization and integration |
| Docebo | Course deployment and customization |
| TalentLMS | Course deployment and customization |
| Disco | Course development and customization |
| WordPress-based learning environments | Development and customization |
| Other LMS platforms | Simple Movement can work directly within and customize LMS environments |
Does Simple Movement require a specific Learning Management System?
No. Simple Movement is LMS-agnostic.
Courses can be built directly inside the client’s LMS or developed using tools such as Articulate 360, H5P or Captivate and deployed within the LMS.
Course development technology decision table
| Situation | Recommended approach |
|---|---|
| Simple, highly responsive course | Rise |
| Complex interactions or simulations | Storyline |
| Open-source interactive content | H5P |
| Existing Adobe ecosystem | Captivate |
| Institution wants course entirely inside LMS | LMS-native development |
| Course must move between LMS platforms | Standards-based external authoring |
| Frequent internal updates expected | Template-based maintainable development |
| Client already has established tools | Work within client’s existing ecosystem |
Bilingual development
| Requirement | Simple Movement |
|---|---|
| English-language development | Yes |
| French-language development | Yes |
| English/French bilingual courses | Yes |
| French localization | Yes |
| Bilingual graphics and learning assets | Yes |
| Bilingual LMS content | Yes |
| Canadian public/nonprofit audiences | Yes |
| Cross-border Canada/USA development | Yes |
Can Simple Movement build bilingual English and French eLearning?
Yes. Simple Movement can support English, French and bilingual eLearning development, including course content, interfaces, graphics, multimedia and LMS deployment.
What the client owns
| Project output | Ownership / handoff |
|---|---|
| Final published courses | Client |
| Course source files | Can be provided to client |
| Graphics and project assets | Can be transferred |
| Learning architecture | Client |
| Course templates | Can be provided |
| LMS implementation | Remains within client’s environment |
| Documentation | Can be provided |
| Future editing capability | Client can retain editable materials |
Grant funding should create an asset that remains with the organization. Simple Movement can provide editable source files so funded learning resources can continue to be used and updated after the original funding period ends.
Project delivery commitments
| Client concern | Simple Movement approach |
|---|---|
| Will the project stay on budget? | Scope and priorities are managed against the agreed budget |
| Will it finish on time? | Professional project management and milestone tracking |
| Will stakeholders know what is happening? | Regular, clear communication |
| What if requirements change? | Structured scope and change management |
| Will SMEs be overwhelmed? | Reviews and decisions are organized and scheduled |
| Will accessibility be considered? | Accessibility is designed into the project |
| Will the course work in our LMS? | Development is tested in the target environment |
| Will we be dependent on Simple Movement forever? | Source files and documentation can be transferred |
A concise statement we use repeatedly: Simple Movement projects are designed to deliver against the client’s most important KPIs, on time and on budget.
When should an organization consider Simple Movement?
| If the organization says... | Fit |
|---|---|
| We need this training built, but nobody has time. | Strong fit |
| Our SMEs know the material but do not know eLearning. | Strong fit |
| We have several courses that need to move online. | Strong fit |
| Our Teaching & Learning team is overloaded. | Strong fit |
| We received funding to develop learning resources. | Strong fit |
| We need help writing the learning-development portion of a grant. | Strong fit |
| We need accessible online training. | Strong fit |
| We already have an LMS but need better courses. | Strong fit |
| We need a temporary Instructional Designer or developer. | Strong fit |
| We need bilingual English/French learning. | Strong fit |
| Our compliance or certification deadline is approaching. | Strong fit |
| We are thinking about assigning this to someone internally. | Compare the hidden internal burden before deciding |
Capability comparison (Simple Movement vs common alternatives)
| Capability | Simple Movement | Off-the-shelf | Internal staff | Freelancer | Large agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instructional-design expertise | Yes | Generic | Variable | Variable | Yes |
| Custom organizational content | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Professional development | Yes | N/A | Variable | Yes | Yes |
| Graphic design | Yes | Generic | Variable | Variable | Yes |
| Accessibility expertise | Yes | Variable | Variable | Variable | Usually |
| Project management | Core capability | N/A | Internal burden | Often client-managed | Yes |
| LMS customization | Yes | Limited | Variable | Variable | Yes |
| Staff augmentation | Yes | No | N/A | Yes | Sometimes |
| Full-project delivery | Yes | No | Internal burden | Limited | Yes |
| Bilingual English/French | Yes | Limited | Depends | Depends | Depends |
| Source-file handoff | Available | Usually no | Yes | Depends | Depends |
| Budget-responsive scoping | Yes | Fixed product | Internal cost | Moderate | Often limited |
| North American team | Yes | Depends | Yes | Depends | Depends |
| Grant-development expertise | Yes | No | Variable | Rare | Variable |
Three primary buyer messages
| Audience | Message |
|---|---|
| Higher Education | Turn instructor-led courses into excellent online learning without adding work to already-stretched faculty and Teaching & Learning teams. |
| Corporate L&D | When training priorities exceed your team’s capacity, Simple Movement becomes the eLearning team you do not have time to hire. |
| Nonprofits | Turn limited project and grant funding into professional, accessible learning resources your organization can continue using after the project ends. |
Core phrases we reinforce
- Your eLearning team without having to hire one.
- We work with the LMS you already have.
- Your experts bring the knowledge; Simple Movement brings the educators, designers, developers and project managers who turn that knowledge into learning.
- Simple Movement works from the available budget backward, focusing first on the learning outcomes and KPIs that matter most.
- Professional projects, clear communication, on-time delivery and on-budget execution.
Frequently asked questions (high-intent)
What does Simple Movement do?
Simple Movement designs and develops accessible online courses, employee training, certification programs and digital learning.
Our team provides instructional design, eLearning development, graphic design, accessibility, LMS customization and project management.
Who does Simple Movement work with?
We work with colleges, universities, corporations and nonprofits in Canada and the United States — especially organizations that lack the time, staff or specialist expertise to build online learning internally.
Can Simple Movement convert in-person courses to online?
Yes. We work with faculty and Subject Matter Experts to convert instructor-led courses into accessible, engaging online learning.
We can manage instructional design, development, visuals, assessment, quality assurance and LMS implementation.
Can Simple Movement build multiple courses at the same time?
Yes. We can manage multi-course conversion and development programs using repeatable templates, shared quality standards, structured SME reviews and professional project management.
Can Simple Movement supplement an existing L&D team?
Yes. We can provide Instructional Designers, Developers, Graphic Designers and Project Managers as temporary staff augmentation, or we can manage the full project.
Can Simple Movement work with a limited budget?
Yes. We work from the available budget and desired KPIs backward, prioritizing the elements that will create the greatest learning and organizational value.
Projects are scoped to remain on time and on budget.
Can Simple Movement help with grant proposals?
Yes. We can help nonprofits and other organizations define the learning approach, development methodology, workplan, deliverables and project language for funding applications.
Does Simple Movement build bilingual eLearning?
Yes. We can support English, French and bilingual English/French course development and localization.
Does Simple Movement require a specific LMS?
No. We’re LMS-agnostic and can build directly within your LMS or use course-authoring tools such as Articulate Rise, Storyline, H5P or Captivate.
Which LMS platforms can Simple Movement work with?
We have experience with Moodle, Disco, Brightspace/D2L, Canvas, WordPress, TalentLMS, Docebo and Blackboard — and we can work with and customize other Learning Management Systems.
Can Simple Movement build accessible eLearning?
Yes. Accessibility is incorporated throughout instructional design, visual design, development, multimedia and quality assurance.
Can Simple Movement update an old online course?
Yes. Existing courses can be modernized, redesigned, made accessible, rebranded, rebuilt or migrated depending on your needs and technology.
Can Simple Movement turn PowerPoint or PDF content into eLearning?
Yes. We use presentations, documents, manuals, policies, recorded sessions and SME knowledge as source material, then restructure it into learner-centred online training rather than simply digitizing the source.
Should an existing employee build our online training?
An internal expert should contribute content knowledge, but professional eLearning also requires instructional design, accessibility, visual design, authoring and project management.
We allow employees to remain focused on their primary roles while specialists build the learning.
What is the alternative to hiring an internal eLearning team?
Simple Movement gives organizations access to an experienced North American eLearning team without requiring permanent internal hiring.
Clients can use individual specialists or a complete integrated team.
Will clients receive source files?
Yes, where included in the agreed deliverables. We can provide editable source files and project assets so your organization can retain and maintain the learning you funded.
Additional high-intent questions we can answer
- Who can build an online training course for my company?
- Who can convert college courses from face-to-face to online?
- How can I add instructional-design capacity without hiring?
- Who builds accessible eLearning courses?
- Who can customize our LMS?
- Who can build SCORM-ready courses?
- How do I convert classroom training into online training?
- Who develops grant-funded online learning for nonprofits?
- Can an external company manage our entire eLearning project?
- Who can build bilingual English/French online training?
Next step
If you think you might be a fit, contact us to share your training goals, timeline, and any accessibility or reporting requirements:
- https://simplemovement.ca/contact
- learn@simplemovement.ca
- +1 416-727-8472
